Friday, June 24, 2016

EXP 3 - SUBMISSION

School for Design & Architecture


SKETCHUP




LUMION

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5e0gGhCWQWNOWl6TDJXMW1fWWc 



The entrance from the Square House draws comparison to traditional Japanese architecture which largely sparked contemporary movements in design toward sustainability and modular construction. 



The SE corner extrudes out past the column supports. The angularity of the plan produces a stark contrast to the curvy bridging. This is to make the architecture visually diverse and add an element of playfulness to nurture occupants experiences. In future, this may extend the building's life as there is reduced chance for replacement.



The bridge joins the upper level of the Square House where learning spaces (study rooms, common area) are located. This encourages co-mingling between design disciplines in the hope of future collaboration. 



The geomteries of the plan coincide directly to the surrounding features - built and natural - to create enclosing planes. Within this angular plan, there is a careful placement of fixed elements such as walls to make the structure easily re-arranged, renovated or deconstructed.

  


The formal teaching spaces are visually separated on the interior to the studio space but physically, they are only partially separated. This is to re-imagine the 'cafe' spaces that helped to glorify the Beuax-Arts pedagogy in Architecture and allow students quiet, seclusion to discuss whilst also symbolically removing division between creative and 'correct' student experiences. 



The north wall is clad entirely in adjustable louvres which work on the principles of passive solar shading and heating. The material is chosen as with exposure to the elements, it will improve with age. Modular construction will allow for ease of inevitable replacement. 



Individual work-space modules that make up the wall allow openness to the remaining space which is then more versatile and flexible to use.



The modules on the roof allow for natural lighting all day and are openable for ventilation. The contained spatial volume becomes very 'free', with openings on all sides.



The adaptive facade on the learning centre envelop uses simple, modular construction to facilitate passive solar shading whilst supplying a natural, fractal aesthetic, typical of sustainable design. The north facade is made up of glazed walls to supply natural light to office spaces, gallery, lecture theatre and student commons minimising need for artificial lighting. 



Office spaces are highly sustainable in design. They embody the notions of integrating spaces with through repetition in design in order to negate overuse of available space and are adaptive to change, with bolted together, lightweight walls. 



TEXTURES IN MODEL


This texture is placed on the underside of the pedestrian bridging between the teaching and learning centre. It highlights the contrasting rectilinear and curvilinear geomtetries converging to insinuate smooth motion between the functionally and physically separate spaces. 






This texture was used to represent grass on the green roof above the bridging and learning centre to draw attention to the materiality of the complex. All the structures and finishes are made from low embodied-carbon materials with limited use of concrete in particular. 


This texture was imposed onto the flooring of high-use circulation areas. It has multi-directional vector lines that suggest motion as well as a regular pattern that appears durable and does not draw focus from the rich, natural texture of the timber used extensively 






EXP 3 - TEXTURES

CUSTOM TEXTURES





Record of attendance to final tutorial


EXP 3 - MOVING ELEMENTS

ADAPTIVE FACADE

The chosen moving elements are placed on the exterior envelope of the structure so that the internal plasticity from open-plan design can be maintained. They are made of modular components designed to increase sustainable, passive design through regulating natural light and ventilation. Their shift allows the envelope to be opened at an adjustable level and function automatically off of information from sensors in the building. 

1. LOUVRES / AWNING






The row of vertical louvres is set on an actuator / pulley system which allows it to move upwards as shown, enabling it dual functionality as both louvres and an awning. This is especially important for passive shading because as the angle and direction of the sun changes (especially for the north facade) it will shield occupants from glare, or allow an abundance of natural light depending on conditions. 


2. 'BASKET-WEAVE' SKIN





The skin is made up of wooden panels aligned in stacked rows along the separated envelope on the learning centre. Once again, the function of this element is to control light entering the building however also serves to help regulate ventilation through breeze filtering. The skin is set on rotational actuators at the edges of panel joints and as the motor arm twists, the angle between panels adjusts. The pattern of movement is also adjustable. In the above graphic, 2-panel planes are alternated in and out from the envelope datum; they then retract to the flattened layout. 




Saturday, June 18, 2016

EXP 3 - THEORY

PRINCIPLE THEORY

MASH-UP


1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235218510_Adaptive_Architecture_-_A_Conceptual_Framework


2. http://www.archdaily.com/785820/how-to-improve-architectural-education-learning-and-unlearning-from-the-beaux-arts-method


3. http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/18/five-reasons-to-adopt-environmental-design


The idea of collaboration within architectural schooling coincides perfectly with the reality that all architectural firms function due to design collaboration. This pedagogical field, like its practice, is open for innovation and experimentation. A reintroduction of the informal Parisian café style of design discussion and collaboration would allow architecture schools to foster architectural innovation. 

The Beaux Arts period in Paris had four primary elements: the Ecole, private ateliers, the Salon, and café life. Contemporary architecture schools maintain many of the core ideas of the Beaux Arts method, yet schools today have lost informal café aspect and with it the spirit of discussing design in a more informal setting. If we dismantle the rigid hierarchy and need for competition and recreate the informal café style of architectural discussion and innovation in contemporary architecture schools, then they would become better environments for learning design and environmental sustainability.

The concerns of the current avant-garde and those of environmental architects meet in nature. After the rigors of the Modern Movement, during which nature-as-model was regarded with great ambivalence, we have returned, on the basis of deeper understanding, to new kinds of nature worship. 


It is the particularity and the dynamism of nature—its capacities to repeat without repeating and to evolve, capacities that have evaded mechanical mass production—which are now within our ability to imitate in material culture. Adaptive architecture is concerned with buildings that are designed to adapt to their environment, their inhabitants and occupants, [it resolves] more of the contradictions between High Tech and environmental practice by leaving the High Tech’s visibility behind. [Adaptive structures] have a number of elements that re-occur across the design space. The re-use of modules...has a long history in architectural design...they are designed to be removed and re-locatedThe governing ideas for both the site and the [building is] in large part derived from climate and topography. Adaptations have impact on the environment that architecture encloses. The form of a building, however, is crucial to its environmental performance, as are its orientation and materials.


“Semiotic structures are binary, hierarchical, closed… . Matter is literally riddled with properties, dissymmetries, inhomogeneities, singularities… Matter is, in short, active, dynamic and creative." Individuals might then be empowered to change architectural layout manually, to combine the re-configurability of different units to establish different architectural topologies, or the building might respond to them in a particular way automatically. Designed specifically for inhabitant intervention... inhabitants will be able to move, rotate and re-position architectural elements

SUMMARY 


If the mash-up is to be distilled into a grouping of the issues and principles raised, we might obtain an Adaptive Design Theory that manifests in modular constructiondesign for sustainability and design planning in close response to situation. In terms of developing spaces that will adapt to the changing architectural curricula, the building's assembly will enable a heightened degree of flexibility in that objects within an open plan will be adjustable to fit the desired function. A greater porosity can then be achieved within plastic spatial topologies of the new structure, which target changing programmatic needs moving into the future. Form, therefore, flows from adhering to the site fabric; a spatial order is not fixed due to the delineation of spatial division via configurable, internal elements. 




PERSPECTIVE DRAWING


1-POINT 




INTEGRATED ELEMENTS 





PLAN DRAWN FROM SITE CONSTRAINTS





OBJECTS ARE MADE TO MOVE









FORM COMPOSED OF MODULES





PROGRAM RESPONDS TO SITE





OCCUPANTS ARE CLOSE TO NATURAL SURROUNDS








DYNAMISM IN ARCHITECTURAL FORM





OPENNESS IN PLAN





SOLID ELEMENTS ARE NOT FIXED




VARIETY IN FORM





PLASTIC TOPOLOGY





ADAPTATIONS HAVE IMPACT ON THE ENCLOSING ENVIRONMENT







SITE IS GENERATOR OF FORMS





RECURRING ELEMENTS ALONG STRUCTURE





ORIENTATION IS VITAL FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN










PRIVATE, SECLUDED SPACE BRINGS 'CAFE' ASPECT 






DESIGN FOR FUTURE DECONSTRUCTION





ASYMMETRICAL STRUCTURES PROVOKE CREATIVITY



TWO-POINT